Call recording laws by state

In 37 states and the District of Columbia, the consent of one person on a phone call is enough to record it. 10 states have an all-party rule for phone calls: California, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Washington. In Connecticut, Delaware and Michigan, two laws or court rulings point different ways, so the table says how.

Each state's page quotes its statute and court rulings from the official pages they come from, with the date we read them: the consent rule for phone calls, penalties, in-person conversations and what the sources say about businesses that record calls.

Last checked October 14, 2026 · 51 jurisdictions

Write a recording notice for your states

A headset and an open notebook with blank pages on an oak desk lit by a window

State by state

38 one-party · 10 all-party · 3 mixed. The rule shown is the one for phone calls; open a state for the details.
Call recording consent rule for phone calls, by state
StatePhone calls
AlabamaOne-party consentAla. Code § 13A-11-30(1) (definition of eavesdrop)
AlaskaOne-party consentAlaska Stat. § 42.20.310 (eavesdropping)
ArizonaOne-party consentAriz. Rev. Stat. § 13-3005 (interception; classification)
ArkansasOne-party consentKing v. State, 2019 Ark. 114 (describing Ark. Code Ann. § 5-60-120)
CaliforniaAll-party consentCal. Penal Code § 632 (confidential communications)
ColoradoOne-party consentColo. Rev. Stat. § 18-9-303 (wiretapping prohibited - penalty)
ConnecticutCriminal law one-party; civil law all-party or noticeConn. Gen. Stat. § 52-570d (civil action for illegal recording of private telephonic communications)
DelawareMixed: two laws read differently11 Del. C. § 2402 (interception of communications; lawful acts)
District of ColumbiaOne-party consentD.C. Code § 23-542 (interception, disclosure, and use of wire or oral communications prohibited)
FloridaAll-party consentFla. Stat. § 934.03 (interception and disclosure prohibited; lawful acts; penalties)
GeorgiaOne-party consentO.C.G.A. § 16-11-66 (a), as quoted in Perkins-Carrillo v. Systemax (N.D. Ga. 2006)
HawaiiOne-party consentHaw. Rev. Stat. § 803-42 (interception prohibited; lawful interceptions)
IdahoOne-party consentIdaho Code § 18-6702 (interception and disclosure prohibited; lawful acts)
IllinoisAll-party consent (private conversations)720 ILCS 5/14-2 (eavesdropping: elements of the offense)
IndianaOne-party consentInd. Code § 35-31.5-2-176 (definition of interception)
IowaOne-party consentIowa Code § 808B.2 (unlawful acts - penalty; consent exception)
KansasOne-party consentK.S.A. 21-6101 (breach of privacy)
KentuckyOne-party consentKRS 526.010 (definition of eavesdrop)
LouisianaOne-party consentLa. R.S. 15:1303 (interception and disclosure of wire, electronic, or oral communications)
MaineOne-party consent15 M.R.S. § 709(4) (definition of intercept)
MarylandAll-party consentMd. Code, Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 10-402 (interception unlawful; lawful acts)
MassachusettsAll-party consent (secret recording)Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 272, § 99 (interception of wire and oral communications)
MichiganMixed: participants may record (Court of Appeals)MCL 750.539a (definitions: eavesdrop, private place)
MinnesotaOne-party consentMinn. Stat. § 626A.02 (interception prohibited; exemptions; penalties)
MississippiOne-party consentMiss. Code Ann. § 41-29-531(e) (Rev. 2018) (party/one-party-consent exception), as quoted in Pope v. Martin
MissouriOne-party consentMo. Rev. Stat. § 542.402 (penalty for illegal wiretapping; permitted activities)
MontanaAll parties must know (a warning counts)Mont. Code Ann. § 45-8-213 (Privacy in communications)
NebraskaOne-party consentNeb. Rev. Stat. § 86-290 (Unlawful acts; penalty)
NevadaAll-party consentNev. Rev. Stat. § 200.620 (interception of wire communication)
New HampshireAll-party consentN.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 570-A:2 (interception and disclosure prohibited)
New JerseyOne-party consentN.J. Stat. Ann. § 2A:156A-4 (lawful interception activities)
New MexicoOne-party consentN.M. Stat. Ann. § 30-12-1 (interference with communications)
New YorkOne-party consentN.Y. Penal Law § 250.00 (eavesdropping; definitions)
North CarolinaOne-party consentN.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-287 (interception and disclosure prohibited)
North DakotaOne-party consentN.D. Cent. Code § 12.1-15-02 (interception of wire or oral communications)
OhioOne-party consentOhio Rev. Code § 2933.52 (interception of wire, oral or electronic communications)
OklahomaOne-party consentOkla. Stat. tit. 13, § 176.4 (acts not prohibited)
OregonOne-party consentOr. Rev. Stat. § 165.540 (obtaining contents of communications)
PennsylvaniaAll-party consent18 Pa.C.S. § 5704 (exceptions to prohibition of interception)
Rhode IslandOne-party consentR.I. Gen. Laws § 11-35-21 (unauthorized interception, disclosure or use)
South CarolinaOne-party consentS.C. Code Ann. § 17-30-30 (interception with a party's consent is lawful)
South DakotaOne-party consentS.D. Codified Laws § 23A-35A-20 (overhearing or recording by eavesdropping device)
TennesseeOne-party consentTenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-601 (as quoted in Lawrence v. Lawrence, Tenn. Ct. App. No. E2010-00395-COA-R3-CV, Nov. 29, 2010)
TexasOne-party consentTex. Penal Code § 16.02 (unlawful interception, use or disclosure)
UtahOne-party consentUtah Code § 77-23a-4 (offenses; lawful interception)
VermontOne-party (federal law)18 U.S.C. § 2511(2)(d) (federal one-party consent exception)
VirginiaOne-party consentVa. Code Ann. § 19.2-62 (interception unlawful; penalties; exceptions)
WashingtonAll-party consentRCW 9.73.030 (intercepting or recording private communication; consent required; announcement rule)
West VirginiaOne-party consentW. Va. Code § 62-1D-3 (interception of communications generally; party-consent exception; penalty)
WisconsinOne-party consentWis. Stat. § 968.31 (interception and disclosure prohibited; party-consent exception; civil action)
WyomingOne-party consentWyo. Stat. § 7-3-702 (prohibition against interception; exceptions; penalties)

One-party, all-party and mixed

One-party consent
One person on the call, who can be the person recording it, can agree to the recording.
All-party consent
Every person on the call has to agree. Some states word this around secret recording, private conversations or a warning; the table shows the wording.
Mixed
Two laws, or a law and a court ruling, point different ways. The state page explains both.

Recording notices

Callers can be in any state. A short notice at the start of a call, such as “This call may be recorded.”, tells them the call may be recorded. Some state laws mention notices or warnings, and their pages quote what those laws say. Whether a notice is enough for a given call is a question for a lawyer licensed in the state.

The disclosure generator shows the rule for each state you pick and writes the notice sentence in English or Spanish.

Recording notices on CallFlux numbers

CallFlux plays a recording notice to callers on every tracking number that records, before the call connects.

How CallFlux call tracking works

Call recording law questions

Which states are one-party consent states?

Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming and the District of Columbia. In each, the consent of one person on the call is enough to record it. Each state's page quotes its law.

Which states require the consent of all parties to record a call?

California, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Washington have an all-party rule for phone calls, each worded a little differently. Connecticut, Delaware and Michigan have mixed rules: two laws or court rulings point different ways. The table shows how each state's rule is worded.

What is the difference between one-party and all-party consent?

Under a one-party rule, one person on the call, who can be the person recording it, can agree to the recording. Under an all-party rule, every person on the call has to agree. Some states word their rule around secret recording, private conversations or a warning instead.

Where do these facts come from?

Only official sources: state statutes on the legislature’s own site and court opinions on the court’s own site. Each state page quotes the pages it relies on, links to them and shows the date we read them.

Is this legal advice?

No. These pages summarize what the official sources say. Laws change and courts read them in different ways, so ask a lawyer licensed in the state about your own calls.

This guide summarizes the official pages linked next to each fact. Laws change and courts read them in different ways, so check the source and ask a lawyer licensed in the state about your own calls. This is not legal advice.

Last checked October 14, 2026.